← Back to the libraryBegin reading
From the library
Various Church Fathers
On Marriage and Concupiscence.
Translated by ANF/NPNF editors
Public domainServed
About this edition
(English) · Translated by ANF/NPNF editors
Contents 106 sections
- Title Page.Front matter
- Retractations.
- Advertisement to the Reader on the Following Treatise.
- A Letter Addressed to the Count Valerius.
- On Marriage and Concupiscence
- Concerning the Argument of This Treatise.
- Why This Treatise Was Addressed to Valerius.
- Conjugal Chastity the Gift of God.
- A Difficulty as Regards the Chastity of Unbelievers. None But a Believer is Truly a Chaste Man.
- The Natural Good of Marriage. All Society Naturally Repudiates a Fraudulent Companion. What is True Conjugal Purity? No True Virginity and Chastity Except in Devotion to True Faith.
- The Censuring of Lust is Not a Condemnation of Marriage; Whence Comes Shame in the Human Body. Adam and Eve Were Not Created Blind; Meaning of Their 'Eyes Being Opened.'
- Man’s Disobedience Justly Requited in the Rebellion of His Own Flesh; The Blush of Shame for the Disobedient Members of the Body.
- The Evil of Lust Does Not Take Away the Good of Marriage.
- This Disease of Concupiscence in Marriage is Not to Be a Matter of Will, But of Necessity; What Ought to Be the Will of Believers in the Use of Matrimony; Who is to Be Regarded as Using, and Not Succumbing To, the Evil of Concupiscence; How the Holy Fathers of the Old Testament Formerly Used Wives.
- Why It Was Sometimes Permitted that a Man Should Have Several Wives, Yet No Woman Was Ever Allowed to Have More Than One Husband. Nature Prefers Singleness in Her Dominations.
- The Sacrament of Marriage; Marriage Indissoluble; The World’s Law About Divorce Different from the Gospel’s.
- Marriage Does Not Cancel a Mutual Vow of Continence; There Was True Wedlock Between Mary and Joseph; In What Way Joseph Was the Father of Christ.
- In the Marriage of Mary and Joseph There Were All the Blessings of the Wedded State; All that is Born of Concubinage is Sinful Flesh.
- Before Christ It Was a Time for Marrying; Since Christ It Has Been a Time for Continence.
- The Teaching of the Apostle on This Subject.
- A Certain Degree of Intemperance is to Be Tolerated in the Case of Married Persons; The Use of Matrimony for the Mere Pleasure of Lust is Not Without Sin, But Because of the Nuptial Relation the Sin is Venial.
- What is Sinless in the Use of Matrimony? What is Attended With Venial Sin, and What with Mortal?
- Continence Better Than Marriage; But Marriage Better Than Fornication.
- Blessing of Matrimony.
- Why Children of Wrath are Born of Holy Matrimony.
- Thus Sinners are Born of Righteous Parents, Even as Wild Olives Spring from the Olive.
- Even Infants, When Unbaptized, are in the Power of the Devil; Exorcism in the Case of Infants, and Renunciation of the Devil.
- Sin Has Not Arisen Out of the Goodness of Marriage; The Sacrament of Matrimony a Great One in the Case of Christ and the Church—A Very Small One in the Case of a Man and His Wife.
- Lust and Shame Come from Sin; The Law of Sin; The Shamelessness of the Cynics.
- Concupiscence in the Regenerate Without Consent is Not Sin; In What Sense Concupiscence is Called Sin.
- Whatever is Born Through Concupiscence is Not Undeservedly in Subjection to the Devil by Reason of Sin; The Devil Deserves Heavier Punishment Than Men.
- Through Lust Original Sin is Transmitted; Venial Sins in Married Persons; Concupiscence of the Flesh, the Daughter and Mother of Sin.
- Concupiscence Remains After Baptism, Just as Languor Does After Recovery from Disease; Concupiscence is Diminished in Persons of Advancing Years, and Increased in the Incontinent.
- How Concupiscence Remains in the Baptized in Act, When It Has Passed Away as to Its Guilt.
- The Evil Desires of Concupiscence; We Ought to Wish that They May Not Be.
- Who is the Man that Can Say, ‘It is No More I that Do It’?
- When Good Will Be Perfectly Done.
- True Freedom Comes with Willing Delight in God’s Law.
- How Concupiscence Made a Captive of the Apostle; What the Law of Sin Was to the Apostle.
- The Flesh, Carnal Affection.
- Even Now While We Still Have Concupiscence We May Be Safe in Christ.
- The Law of Sin with Its Guilt in Unbaptized Infants. By Adam’s Sin the Human Race Has Become a 'Wild Olive Tree.'
- To Baptism Must Be Referred All Remission of Sins, and the Complete Healing of the Resurrection. Daily Cleansing.
- By the Holiness of Baptism, Not Sins Only, But All Evils Whatsoever, Have to Be Removed. The Church is Not Yet Free from All Stain.
- Refutation of the Pelagians by the Authority of St. Ambrose, Whom They Quote to Show that the Desire of the Flesh is a Natural Good.
- Preliminary Notes on the Second Book.
- Introductory Statement.
- In This and the Four Next Chapters He Adduces the Garbled Extracts He Has to Consider.
- Section 49 — The Same Continued.
- Section 50 — The Same Continued.
- Section 51 — The Same Continued.
- Section 52 — The Same Continued.
- Augustin Adduces a Passage Selected from the Preface of Julianus. (See ‘The Unfinished Work,’ i. 73.)
- Augustin Refutes the Passage Adduced Above.
- The Catholics Maintain the Doctrine of Original Sin, and Thus are Far from Being Manicheans.
- In What Manner the Adversary’s Cavils Must Be Refuted.
- The Devil the Author, Not of Nature, But Only of Sin.
- Eve’s Name Means Life, and is a Great Sacrament of the Church.
- The Pelagian Argument to Show that the Devil Has No Rights in the Fruits of Marriage.
- Concupiscence Alone, in Marriage, is Not of God.
- Man, by Birth, is Placed Under the Dominion of the Devil Through Sin; We Were All One in Adam When He Sinned.
- It is Not of Us, But Our Sins, that the Devil is the Author.
- The Pelagians are Not Ashamed to Eulogize Concupiscence, Although They are Ashamed to Mention Its Name.
- The Same Continued.
- The Pelagians Misunderstand ‘Seed’ In Scripture.
- Original Sin is Derived from the Faulty Condition of Human Seed.
- It is the Good God That Gives Fruitfulness, and the Devil That Corrupts the Fruit.
- Shall We Be Ashamed of What We Do, or of What God Does?
- The Pelagians Affirm that God in the Case of Abraham and Sarah Aroused Concupiscence as a Gift from Heaven.
- What Covenant of God the New-Born Babe Breaks. What Was the Value of Circumcision.
- Augustin Not the Deviser of Original Sin.
- The Child in No Sense Formed by Concupiscence.
- The Pelagians Argue that God Sometimes Closes the Womb in Anger, and Opens It When Appeased.
- Augustin’s Answer to This Argument. Its Dealing with Scripture.
- The Same Continued. Augustin Also Asserts that God Forms Man at Birth.
- The Case of Abimelech and His House Examined.
- Why God Proceeds to Create Human Beings, Who He Knows Will Be Born in Sin.
- God Not the Author of the Evil in Those Whom He Creates.
- Though God Makes Us, We Perish Unless He Re-makes Us in Christ.
- The Pelagians Argue that Cohabitation Rightly Used is a Good, and What is Born from It is Good.
- He Answers the Arguments of Julianus. What is the Natural Use of the Woman? What is the Unnatural Use?
- God Made Nature Good: the Saviour Restores It When Corrupted.
- If There is No Marriage Without Cohabitation, So There is No Cohabitation Without Shame.
- Jovinian Used Formerly to Call Catholics Manicheans; The Arians Also Used to Call Catholics Sabellians.
- Man Born of Whatever Parentage is Sinful and Capable of Redemption.
- Augustin Declines the Dilemma Offered Him.
- The Pelagians Argue that Original Sin Cannot Come Through Marriage If Marriage is Good.
- The Pelagians Try to Get Rid of Original Sin by Their Praise of God’s Works; Marriage, in Its Nature and by Its Institution, is Not the Cause of Sin.
- The Good Tree in the Gospel that Cannot Bring Forth Evil Fruit, Does Not Mean Marriage.
- The Pelagians Argue that If Sin Comes by Birth, All Married People Deserve Condemnation.
- Answer to This Argument: The Apostle Says We All Sinned in One.
- The Reign of Death, What It Is; The Figure of the Future Adam; How All Men are Justified Through Christ.
- The Scriptures Repeatedly Teach Us that All Sin in One.
- Original Sin Arose from Adam’s Depraved Will. Whence the Corrupt Will Sprang.
- In Infants Nature is of God, and the Corruption of Nature of the Devil.
- The Rise and Origin of Evil. The Exorcism and Exsufflation of Infants, a Primitive Christian Rite.
- To Call Those that Teach Original Sin Manicheans is to Accuse Ambrose, Cyprian, and the Whole Church.
- Sin Was the Origin of All Shameful Concupiscence.
- Concupiscence Need Not Have Been Necessary for Fruitfulness.
- How Marriage is Now Different Since the Existence of Sin.
- Lust is a Disease; The Word ‘Passion’ In the Ecclesiastical Sense.
- The Pelagians Allow that Christ Died Even for Infants; Julianus Slays Himself with His Own Sword.
- The Great Sin of the First Man.
- Adam’s Sin is Derived from Him to Every One Who is Born Even of Regenerate Parents; The Example of the Olive Tree and the Wild Olive.
- The Pelagians Can Hardly Venture to Place Concupiscence in Paradise Before the Commission of Sin.
- Let Not the Pelagians Indulge Themselves in a Cruel Defence of Infants.
Available to read online.